Further Thoughts on Knitting Naturally
If there is one thing that becomes more and more apparent the older I get, it is that there is very little in this world that is black and white — shades of gray are certainly the order of the day. Trying to find ways to reduce your impact on the environment is no exception. You make one change with the facts you have. Later you may learn that there are other factors involved that you were not aware of and you realize that you’ve been going around feeling really good about yourself for doing something that isn’t all that great in the long run. So, you change again with your new information and the cycle continues. Life is nothing if not constant evolution.
In response to my last post I received a number of thoughtful and articulate responses that provided some excellent food for thought. They also made me realize that I ought to clarify what I am trying to accomplish for myself a little bit more.
First of all, I want to declare the Village a guilt-free zone. I find, almost without fail, that when the subject of the environment and our impact on it comes up, the response is usually thick with guilt. Whether it is a confession that you don’t recycle and you feel badly about it or a defensive stance that wants to justify or even deny our impact, there is an underlying sense of guilt. I know that I easily fall into that trap as well. However, I have discovered over the years that guilt is not a very useful emotion, it is more like a sticky trap. It seldom helps us make lasting changes and usually is only there to be our whipping post when we inevitably can’t live up to unrealistic expectations (yeah, I know, I’m talking to myself here).
Second of all, this is not about denial. It is about exposure and awareness and exploration. I wanted to define some loose parameters that would help me open some new doors that I hadn’t thought to look behind before. As someone who is a big fan of those gray areas in life, I fully expected in my searching to discover that it is not as simple as saying — chemical bad, plant pretty. And this is exactly the case. As a couple of the commentors pointed out, just because something is “natural” doesn’t mean it is not toxic. Many of the mordants used with natural dyes are quite harmful. This will certainly require a little more in depth analysis before I get started on plant dying. On the other hand, many modern chemical dyes have been manufactured to bond more thoroughly with the fibers so that fewer chemicals actually wash out in the end and are very low in toxicity (appropriately enough they seem to be called low-impact dyes). And while the chemicals are still an issue with large-scale textile mills, the real culprits are the amounts of water and energy required for the process. Yet even in that, strides are being made. In more developed nations, and especially in Europe (where environmental laws appear to be more stringent) and also Australia, the impact has been severely diminished over the last couple of decades.
However, as more and more textile operations move into third world nations with few, if any, environmental laws, they are relying on older methods that require considerably more water and energy and the harsher chemicals are still being used and washed into the water supply. I know I can’t change that, but I don’t want my inability to effect that kind of change to be the reason I don’t try and explore other options. Options such as locally dyed or produced fibers from smaller companies and homebased businesses like Black Bunny Fibers (owned and operated by local Philly yarn goddess Carol of Rosie’s Yarn Cellar and Go Knit in Your Hat) or from small-scale, farm-based operations like Cranberry Moon Farms (I met the shepherd of this farm last year at Rhinebeck and she was just wonderful). These are just a couple examples of dozens upon dozens of smaller businesses that are worth supporting.
Thirdly, this project for me is strictly about cultivating awareness. As I said, I’m certainly not going to change the world. And I’m not trying to here. Well, I guess in a way I am — but only insofar as I am changing myself. As Tara pointed out, given the amount of knitting that gets done and the amount of laundry people do, a much more impactful project would be to get everyone to stop using laundry detergents that are petroleum based. And she is absolutely right. There are far more impactful changes you can make in your life. The purpose of this exercise or experiment was to get you thinking about alternative knitting options — that can mean anything, including working with natural fleeces without dyes, using more organic fibers from larger companies like Cascade or Blue Sky Alpacas, experimenting with plant dyes, supporting local yarn producers, buying from a nearby farm, ordering plant dyed fibers from California or Australia. Really, it is wide open.
I hope this helps clarify what I am thinking. I also sincerely hope that the zeal and excitement and enthusiasm in my last post came across as just that. If there is one thing I dislike, it is self-righteousness in any form. I don’t care if it is religious in nature, environmental, political or anything else. Personal choices are personal and as much as I would sometimes like a soapbox, preaching is just plain obnoxius. I much more prefer dialogue, because it implies that we both (or all) have things to learn from each other. Whenever I get excited about a project like this or find some new tidbit of information that catches my eye, I tend to blather on about it. Mostly what I am looking for is conversation and so I always appreciate all your thoughtful comments.
April 28th, 2006 at 12:54 pm
Hi. I’m a lurker, and this has nothing to do with your actual post today. For some reason your husband’s blog is coming up under your feed in Bloglines. Since it’s not some random blog, I thought I’d ask you first if you know why?
April 28th, 2006 at 4:22 pm
I totally agree about guilt being a largely useless emotion. Shame is a close second. Much better to have a positive outlook and actually talk about what might be a ‘better’ environmental alternative. I know one of the people on a list I’m on is a botanist and has a long explanation of why cotton is a synthetic.
I’m looking forward to some more discussion of this. And it could relate to that laundry thing. I think folks tend to wash too much. One of the properties of wool is that it airs very well. So hanging a sweater on the line to blow in the breeze can freshen it up quite a bit and avoid the need to launder. I wash wool sweaters very infrequently and thus they are much lower impact than tops I would feel the need to wash after wearing for one day.
April 28th, 2006 at 7:51 pm
As alwaya, Rachel, you are truly inspiring! Moreso than I think you know sometimes.
April 29th, 2006 at 3:04 pm
This is an interesting topic and everyone who voiced concerns over what impact different things have on the environment had valid points. The fact is that anything we do (including just existing) has an impact and we can’t help that. All we can do is try and limit the damage we do when we can and try not to drive ourselves crazy over what we can’t change. So, be careful when using ‘natural’ dyes, explore natural colored fibers and don’t feel guilty when you buy a dyed yarn. After all, we spin and knit as a hobby. Surely that is better for the earth than running three-wheelers all over the desert, racing cars that suck gas, or any of the other activities that pollute, use lots of a non-renewable resourses or tear up an eco-system. And I’m sure even those things can be done either more responsibly or less responsibly depending on how much care is taken.
April 30th, 2006 at 12:01 pm
I came over to comment for the same reason Cordelia spoke up. Nothing terribly interesting to contribute, but I expect to enjoy watching the discussion and your natural knitting.
April 30th, 2006 at 12:04 pm
I’m afraid that’s my fault again, naomi! I’m having some technical issues with .htaccess files and the main site. I apologize for the clutter in your blog lines subscriptions, but I’ve turned off the feature that was causing the problem now so it shouldn’t reoccur!
April 30th, 2006 at 8:03 pm
On an unrelated note, I saw a listing for a double-treadle louet on the Spinners’ Housecleaning Page–you might want to check into that.
May 8th, 2006 at 4:51 pm
[...] Speaking of alongs, I thought some of y’all might be interested in The Summer of Knitting Naturally (more info to be found here). I’d probably join in myself but with enough knitting and crochet projects on my plate one of the ways I can reduce my impact is by not buying more than I need to. I am fascinated by those links, though. I may chat more about them when I get through Knitting in America which references one of the yarn sources she talks about. [...]
May 16th, 2006 at 6:08 am
My family writes a column about food issues for our local food co-op newsletter. Recently we’ve written about the local food challenge (last year in August and in August for us again this year, although the official is in May). It certainly seems like knitting locally (meaning buying a local fleece) is in my cards for the summer now!