The God of Sex and Lettuce
Friday, January 21st, 2005So tomorrow morning begins week two of the paper route. Don’t even ask me how tired I am, because I don’t want to talk about it. Also, it has been bloody cold here. The balmy 45-degrees and clear skies that marked our first day on the route have been replaced by cold, snow, more cold, and even more snow. It was something below zero this morning and my hands were numb before we even left the depot. And as for snow, all I can say at this point is thank god for my knee-high Doc Martin’s. Really, though, the route is a snap and after four days on our own, we have it mostly down. Even yesterday in the midst of a blizzard, we got everything delivered in two hours. And yes, I did say blizzard. Though that may be a slight exaggeration, but not by much.
As a little perk for being such great newspaper delivery persons, we are treated to a free newspaper everyday. Lucky us.
I wasn’t sure how I would like this being that I am a member of the non-newspaper-reading, non-tv-news-watching crowd. It isn’t that I am uninformed. I just don’t think looking at newspapers is the best way to get a feel for the true state of the world or even just your neighborhood. I know a lot of people who read the newspaper everyday from cover to cover and don’t seem to have a clue about what is going on in the world, let alone their neighborhood. Mostly these people are just freaked out about crime. Not specific crimes, but crime in the most vague possible sense.
Me, I get my information from other sources. Sources that I (mostly) trust. Sources that are often online. Sources that are not all about sensationalistic garbage and viewer/reader retention (or at least if they are, proclaim it loudly). Sources that don’t dismiss conspiracy theory out of hand. Sources that are not involved in the plot to keep us all freaked out, timid, frightened consumers desperately needing to be told what to want and what to think. I will spare you my lecture on the news media as the gatekeepers of information. I will also refrain from extensive discourse on the inaccuracies of reporting, the inability of journalists to interpret events in any other way than through their own “eyes” (i.e. worldviews, experiences, culture, biases, etc.), and worse, the catering of “news” media to their advertisers, their rich bosses, and the politicians who’s pockets they are comfortably nestled in. Not that I have strong opinions about this stuff or anything. I’m just suspicious. Also, am I the only one who feels that inviting a newspaper into your home is a little bit like inviting sex-offenders and serial killers in? I mean, is it necessary to have a picture of a creepy man on my kitchen table who killed some guy just so he could take his wallet? Is it necessary for me to know all the brutal and gory details of a sexual assault? It seems to me that these crimes are personal (committed against an actual person) and therefore deserve some privacy and respect. So for me, the answer is no. It is one thing if the intent is to be informative, but too often it feels like they are just cashing in on someone else’s misery.
And yet here I am, trotting home every morning (just as everyone else is getting up, I might remind you) with the newspaper. Oh the Irony. This past week I have learned all kinds of important things. Like, apparently Ice Cube’s acting career is moving into family oriented comedy. The only comic worth reading (still) is Boondocks - though a Republican administration has been good fodder for Doonesbury. And, Cancer is the new number one killer.
Be afraid, be very afraid of cancer, because everyone gets it and probably everyone will die of it. You might even have cancer RIGHT NOW! Of course, if you actually bothered to read the whole article (which, being the hypochondriac I am, I did -they sucked me right in with their fearmongering) you will learn that cancer only took the number one slot because heart disease has done a nose dive thanks to fewer smokers than ever before. Also, it mentions that just because cancer took the #1 slot by default, there is still good news - it too is on the decline by about 1% every year since 1999. It also pointed out how many people actually die of cancer every year — something like 500,000 people. The smallness of the number shocked me considering the threat that I (and apparently many others) feel constantly under. I mean seriously, how many of us live in this country? Like 295 Million? If only 1.8 million of us are getting diagnosed with cancer and 64% of us are surviving it, things are looking pretty good.
The American Cancer Society has a great download that is filled with information and statistics on cancer. I must have spent about an hour just calculating the actual risk that cancer represents and marveling at the fact that I have spent any time at all worrying about it. Granted, losing my good friend to cancer of everywhere a year and a half ago turned the volume up on the worry speakers, but surprisingly, reading through this article made me feel so much better. I would like to point out that 500,000 deaths doesn’t seem like a small number when you have just lost your best friend, or your partner, or you child. But, as one of my favorite nurse practitioners pointed out to me once - most people don’t have cancer. I marveled that she could keep such excellent perspective in the wake of losing her third friend that year to one form or another of the disease.
I learned lots of other things too that I have promptly (merciful gods in heaven) forgotten or am pretending to forget. Like why yesterday’s lead article on the front page was about how a private college in Central New York rejected a man from their teaching program after learning that he favored Corporal Punishment in the classroom and felt that multi-cultural learning had no place in Americun Skools. I couldn’t tell if they were saying it was wrong to have “Rejected him for his personal beliefs” or if they were trying to point out what an absolute imbecile he is. Wasn’t there anything else going on in the world?
One good thing about the paper - crossword puzzles. They aren’t so much fun as they areââ?¬Â¦compelling. Why I feel compelled to plumb the depths of my ignorance, I can’t say. I can only blame the New York Times Crossword and the way it taunts me on a (now) daily basis. On Tuesday I think I answered (probably incorrectly) three clues before I marched off to my computer and began googling the obvious ones (best director and film 1967, Khartoum’s country, etc.). This led me to my Fun Discovery Of The Week. The clue was “Egyptian Fertility God.” I finally found out that the answer was Amon (thanks to godchecker.com), but not before learning that the Egyptian god of lettuce and sex was named Min. Maybe that is what we need here - fewer newspapers and more gods.
See us? We are knitting. Together! In my den! Me and my mom.
A couple of months ago Kari made the fatal mistake of telling me (a known knitter) that she had found a basket of knitting stuff just lying around in her attic. “I ought to send you this stuff,” She said. “Someone should get some use out of it.”